Stuckey v. Stuckey

940 So. 2d 1027, 2006 WL 964733
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedApril 14, 2006
Docket2040598
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 940 So. 2d 1027 (Stuckey v. Stuckey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuckey v. Stuckey, 940 So. 2d 1027, 2006 WL 964733 (Ala. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinions

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C), Ala. R.App. P.; Baggett v.Baggett, 855 So.2d 556, 559-60 (Ala.Civ.App. 2003);Brasfield v. Brasfield, 679 So.2d 1091, 1095 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996); and O'Neal v. O'Neal, 678 So.2d 161, 164-65 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996).

THOMPSON and PITTMAN, JJ., concur.

CRAWLEY, P.J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with writing, which MURDOCK, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stuckey v. Stuckey
940 So. 2d 1027 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
940 So. 2d 1027, 2006 WL 964733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuckey-v-stuckey-alacivapp-2006.