Home/Supreme Court/Stuart v. Wilson

Stuart v. Wilson

371 U.S. 576, 83 S. Ct. 547, 9 L. Ed. 2d 537, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2232
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 21, 1963·No. 543·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

371 U.S. 576 (1963)

STUART ET AL.
v.
WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.

No. 543.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 21, 1963.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, and Tom I. McFarling, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stuart v. Wilson, 371 U.S. 576, 83 S. Ct. 547, 9 L. Ed. 2d 537, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2232 (1963).

371 U.S. 576 (Stuart v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reisinger v. Commonwealth
399 A.2d 1160 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians v. United States Food & Drug Administration
582 F.2d 849 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
Beck v. McLeod
240 F. Supp. 708 (E.D. South Carolina, 1965)