Home/Supreme Court/Stuart v. Wilson

Stuart v. Wilson

371 U.S. 576, 83 S. Ct. 547, 9 L. Ed. 2d 537, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2232
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 21, 1963
Docket543
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 371 U.S. 576 (Stuart v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuart v. Wilson, 371 U.S. 576, 83 S. Ct. 547, 9 L. Ed. 2d 537, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2232 (1963).

Opinion

371 U.S. 576 (1963)

STUART ET AL.
v.
WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.

No. 543.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 21, 1963.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, and Tom I. McFarling, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reisinger v. Commonwealth
399 A.2d 1160 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians v. United States Food & Drug Administration
582 F.2d 849 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
Beck v. McLeod
240 F. Supp. 708 (E.D. South Carolina, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 U.S. 576, 83 S. Ct. 547, 9 L. Ed. 2d 537, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuart-v-wilson-scotus-1963.