Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

600 So. 2d 686, 1992 La. LEXIS 2280, 1992 WL 153002

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 La. LEXIS 2466 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 1, 1992·No. No. 92-CC-1895·Published

Opinion

In re Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 58318; 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 58319; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 0725.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant and reverse. COLE, J., would grant and reverse on tire specification evidence issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 58318; 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 58319; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 0725.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant and reverse. COLE, J., would grant and reverse on tire specification evidence issue.

Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 600 So. 2d 686, 1992 La. LEXIS 2280, 1992 WL 153002 (La. 1992).

Pincite

600 So. 2d 686 (Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.