Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

550 So. 2d 641, 1989 La. LEXIS 2466, 1989 WL 124701

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 20, 1989·No. No. 89-CC-1742·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

In re Stuart, Cecil L.; Roussel, Marilyn Peterson; Stuart, Harvey; Stuart, Cecil Jr.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW88 1942; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No.' 53318, 58319.

Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 78.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed; trial court order for new trial is reinstated.

MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ for argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Stuart, Cecil L.; Roussel, Marilyn Peterson; Stuart, Harvey; Stuart, Cecil Jr.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW88 1942; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No.' 53318, 58319.

Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 78.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed; trial court order for new trial is reinstated.

MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ for argument.

Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 550 So. 2d 641, 1989 La. LEXIS 2466, 1989 WL 124701 (La. 1989).

Pincite

550 So. 2d 641 (Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related