Strozier v. City of Hawkinsville

57 S.E. 969, 1 Ga. App. 285, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 218
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 21, 1907
Docket185
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 S.E. 969 (Strozier v. City of Hawkinsville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strozier v. City of Hawkinsville, 57 S.E. 969, 1 Ga. App. 285, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 218 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

S. was convicted in tlie municipal court of Hawkinsville of the violation of a city ordinance. He filed a petition to the superior court of Pulaski county for the writ of certiorari, under the act of 1902 (Acts 1902, p. 105). Attached to the petition was the affidavit in forma pauperis required by that act. The judge refused to sanction the petition, and his refusal to do so was assigned as error and brought to this court. Held, that the judge erred in refusing to sanction the petition, as the evidence incorporated therein clearly showed that there was no proof of the venue. Mill v. State, ante, 134.

Judgment reversed.

Petition for certiorari, from Pulaski superior court — -Judge Martin. January 11, 1907. Argued February 18, Decided. February 21, 1907. H. L. Grice, Tomlinson Fort, W. L. & Warren Grice, for plaintiff in error. M. E. Boyer, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andrews v. City of Atlanta
67 S.E. 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 S.E. 969, 1 Ga. App. 285, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strozier-v-city-of-hawkinsville-gactapp-1907.