Andrews v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Andrews v. City of Atlanta

67 S.E. 109, 7 Ga. App. 472, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 357

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 22, 1910

Docket2292

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.E. 109 (Andrews v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews v. City of Atlanta, 67 S.E. 109, 7 Ga. App. 472, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 357 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell J.

1. An assignment of error averring that a judgment is illegal, because it is contrary to the evidence, against the weight of the evidence, and without evidence to support it, is sufficient to raise the question of venue. Mill v. State, 1 Ga. App. 134 (57 S. E. 969).

2. As affirmative proof of the venue did not appear, and therefore, according to the allegations of the petition for certiorari, the jurisdiction of the trial court was not proved, it was error to refuse to sanction the writ of certiorari. Strozier v. Hawkinsville, 1 Ga. App. 285 (57 S. E. 969) ; Minor v. Atlanta, ante, 471 (67 S. E. 108).

3. The remaining questions raised by the petition for certiorari are ruled in Loeb v. Jennings, 133 Ga. 796 (67 S. E. 101).

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI