Andrews v. City of Atlanta

67 S.E. 109, 7 Ga. App. 472, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 357
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 22, 1910·No. 2292·Published

Opinion

Russell J.

1. An assignment of error averring that a judgment is illegal, because it is contrary to the evidence, against the weight of the evidence, and without evidence to support it, is sufficient to raise the question of venue. Mill v. State, 1 Ga. App. 134 (57 S. E. 969).

2. As affirmative proof of the venue did not appear, and therefore, according to the allegations of the petition for certiorari, the jurisdiction of the trial court was not proved, it was error to refuse to sanction the writ of certiorari. Strozier v. Hawkinsville, 1 Ga. App. 285 (57 S. E. 969) ; Minor v. Atlanta, ante, 471 (67 S. E. 108).

3. The remaining questions raised by the petition for certiorari are ruled in Loeb v. Jennings, 133 Ga. 796 (67 S. E. 101).

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. City of Atlanta, 67 S.E. 109, 7 Ga. App. 472, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 357 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

67 S.E. 109 (Andrews v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loeb v. Jennings
67 S.E. 101 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Mill v. State
57 S.E. 969 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Strozier v. City of Hawkinsville
57 S.E. 969 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Minor v. City of Atlanta
67 S.E. 108 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)