Strowmatt v. Volunteer State Life Insurance Company

176 So. 2d 563
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 1965
Docket5314
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 176 So. 2d 563 (Strowmatt v. Volunteer State Life Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strowmatt v. Volunteer State Life Insurance Company, 176 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

176 So.2d 563 (1965)

Fannie Bonalene STROWMATT, Appellant,
v.
The VOLUNTEER STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Tennessee Corporation, Appellee.

No. 5314.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 18, 1965.
Rehearing Denied July 15, 1965.

*564 Arthur D. Ginsburg, of Paderewski, Cramer & Robinson, Sarasota, for appellant.

Henry P. Trawick, Jr., of Kirk, Pinkerton, Sparrow, Trawick & McClelland, Sarasota, for appellee.

ANDREWS, Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff Fannie Bonalene Strowmatt from a summary judgment entered for the defendant Volunteer State Life Insurance Company. The plaintiff is the beneficiary under a life insurance policy on the life of Charles David Strowmatt, deceased.

At the time of the death of the deceased an autopsy was performed, and the cause of death was determined to be asphyxia due to aspiration vomitus in trachea. Chemical analysis of the blood and contents of the stomach showed excessive quantities of alcohol and barbiturates. The effect of the judgment of the court was that the plaintiff was not entitled to accidental death benefits in that the death of her husband was not the result of bodily injuries effected solely and independently of all other causes through external, violent and accidental means.

The decision in this case depends on an interpretation of the words "external means." It is recognized that death caused by choking on food in an attempt to swallow same which accidentally passes into the lungs is the result of external, violent and accidental means. However, aspirated vomitus matter is not food. It may have been food at one time, but having entered the stomach it is so changed that it can no longer be classified in that category. The substance which caused the asphyxiation was inside the body and on its way out during the vomiting process, and therefore did not constitute "external means" of death of the deceased.

We are not able to find any Florida cases directly in point. The question has, however, been considered in a number of other jurisdictions. Towner v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, La. App. 1962, 137 So.2d 449; McCallum v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of N.Y., D.C.E.D.Va. 1959, 175 F. Supp. 3.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C.J., and McNATT, JOHN M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spaid v. Cal-Western States Life Insurance
130 Cal. App. 3d 803 (California Court of Appeal, 1982)
Jones v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.
357 So. 2d 976 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1978)
Weaver v. Home Security Life Insurance Company
201 S.E.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Hatcher v. Southern Life & Health Insurance
207 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 So. 2d 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strowmatt-v-volunteer-state-life-insurance-company-fladistctapp-1965.