Oakford v. Oakford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Oakford v. Oakford

176 So. 2d 563

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1963·No. No. 63-671·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are called upon to answer a question certified to us by the chancellor of the Circuit Court of Dade County pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 4.6, 31 F.S.A.

It appearing that the chancellor has already made judicial determination of the question, there is no basis for our entertaining the certified question. The attempted certification amounts to an interlocutory appeal. The certificate is denied. See Hunter v. Flowers, Fla.1949, 38 So.2d 438; Johnson v. Southeast Title and Insurance, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 67; Prigger v. Kingery, Fla.App.1962, 144 So.2d 323.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are called upon to answer a question certified to us by the chancellor of the Circuit Court of Dade County pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 4.6, 31 F.S.A.

It appearing that the chancellor has already made judicial determination of the question, there is no basis for our entertaining the certified question. The attempted certification amounts to an interlocutory appeal. The certificate is denied. See Hunter v. Flowers, Fla.1949, 38 So.2d 438; Johnson v. Southeast Title and Insurance, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 67; Prigger v. Kingery, Fla.App.1962, 144 So.2d 323.

Oakford v. Oakford, 176 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

176 So. 2d 563 (Oakford v. Oakford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related