Stroupe v. Radio Shack

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1307

EDWARD E. STROUPE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RADIO SHACK; TANDY CORPORATION; TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-13-1)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Scott Bell, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Stroupe v. Radio Shack, No. CA-05-13-1 (W.D.

Va. Mar. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -