Stroupe v. Radio Shack

Fourth Circuit

Stroupe v. Radio Shack

133 F. App'x 895

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 14, 2005·No. No. 05-1307·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stroupe v. Radio Shack, No. CA-05-13-1 (W.D.Va. Mar. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stroupe v. Radio Shack, No. CA-05-13-1 (W.D.Va. Mar. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Stroupe v. Radio Shack, 133 F. App'x 895 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

133 F. App'x 895 (Stroupe v. Radio Shack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related