Stroupe v. Radio Shack
This text of Stroupe v. Radio Shack (Stroupe v. Radio Shack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1307
EDWARD E. STROUPE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RADIO SHACK; TANDY CORPORATION; TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-13-1)
Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Scott Bell, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Stroupe v. Radio Shack, No. CA-05-13-1 (W.D.
Va. Mar. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stroupe v. Radio Shack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stroupe-v-radio-shack-ca4-2005.