Strong v. . Glasgow

6 N.C. 289
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1813
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 6 N.C. 289 (Strong v. . Glasgow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strong v. . Glasgow, 6 N.C. 289 (N.C. 1813).

Opinion

By the Court.

This case is not influenced by the principles that decided the case of Streator v. Jones, (1 Murph. 449.) The complainants allege, that the Defendant, B. Sheppard, contrary to the agreement he had entered into, which was to purchase the property for the complainants, took an absolute deed to himselfi They were not privy to that deed, and of course not hound by it. They are therefore at liberty to produce parol evidence to establish the original contract.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. Lester
135 S.E. 778 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Roberts v. . Massey
116 S.E. 407 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
Wilson v. . Jones
97 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
Pritchard v. Williams
175 N.C. 319 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
Jones v. . Jones
80 S.E. 430 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
Gaylord v. . Gaylord
63 S.E. 1028 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
Hawkins v. . Hawkins
4 N.C. 107 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1814)
Strong v. . Glasgow
4 N.C. 24 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1814)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.C. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-glasgow-nc-1813.