Strong v. . Glasgow

6 N.C. 289
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1813·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This case is not influenced by the principles that decided the case of Streator v. Jones, (1 Murph. 449.) The complainants allege, that the Defendant, B. Sheppard, contrary to the agreement he had entered into, which was to purchase the property for the complainants, took an absolute deed to himselfi They were not privy to that deed, and of course not hound by it. They are therefore at liberty to produce parol evidence to establish the original contract.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strong v. . Glasgow, 6 N.C. 289 (N.C. 1813).

6 N.C. 289 (Strong v. . Glasgow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. Lester
135 S.E. 778 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Roberts v. . Massey
116 S.E. 407 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
Wilson v. . Jones
97 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
Pritchard v. Williams
175 N.C. 319 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
Jones v. . Jones
80 S.E. 430 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
Gaylord v. . Gaylord
63 S.E. 1028 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
Hawkins v. . Hawkins
4 N.C. 107 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1814)
Strong v. . Glasgow
4 N.C. 24 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1814)