Strong v. Glasgow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Strong v. Glasgow

1 N.C. 279

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Strong v. Glasgow. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 N.C. 289 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 15, 1811·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

This case is not influenced by the principles that decided the case of Streeter v. Jones. The plaintiffs allege here, that the defendant, contrary to the agreement he had entered into, which was to purchase the property for the complainants, took an absolute deed to himself.—The complainants were not privy to that deed, and of course are not bound by it. They are therefore at liberty to produce parol testimony to establish the original contract.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This case is not influenced by the principles that decided the case of Streeter v. Jones. The plaintiffs allege here, that the defendant, contrary to the agreement he had entered into, which was to purchase the property for the complainants, took an absolute deed to himself.—The complainants were not privy to that deed, and of course are not bound by it. They are therefore at liberty to produce parol testimony to establish the original contract.

Strong v. Glasgow, 1 N.C. 279 (N.C. 1811).

Pincite

1 N.C. 279 (Strong v. Glasgow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.