Strong v. Glasgow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Strong v. Glasgow

1 N.C. 279

DecidedJuly 15, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 279 (Strong v. Glasgow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strong v. Glasgow, 1 N.C. 279 (N.C. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This case is not influenced by the principles that decided the case of Streeter v. Jones. The plaintiffs allege here, that the defendant, contrary to the agreement he had entered into, which was to purchase the property for the complainants, took an absolute deed to himself.—The complainants were not privy to that deed, and of course are not bound by it. They are therefore at liberty to produce parol testimony to establish the original contract.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This case is not influenced by the principles that decided the case of Streeter v. Jones. The plaintiffs allege here, that the defendant, contrary to the agreement he had entered into, which was to purchase the property for the complainants, took an absolute deed to himself.—The complainants were not privy to that deed, and of course are not bound by it. They are therefore at liberty to produce parol testimony to establish the original contract.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-glasgow-nc-1811.