Strong v. Beardslee

18 Johns. 130
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1820
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 Johns. 130 (Strong v. Beardslee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strong v. Beardslee, 18 Johns. 130 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

According to the true construction of the 22d section of the “ act to extend the jurisdiction of justices of the peace,’’ (sess. 41. ch. 94.) passed April 10th> 1818, where the sum demanded exceeds 25 dollars, either party has a right to insist,- that the jury shall consist of twelve, instead of six jurors : but the party must make his demand of the justice, that the jury should consist of twelve, before the venire is issued, so. that twenty may be summoned. Here the venire was for twelve jurors, and there was no demand or claim to have more summoned, until six were drawn and sworn. The defendant was then too late. The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bullard v. Spoor
2 Cow. 430 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Johns. 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-beardslee-nysupct-1820.