Bullard v. Spoor

2 Cow. 430
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1823
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Cow. 430 (Bullard v. Spoor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bullard v. Spoor, 2 Cow. 430 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Opinion

Curia.

The defendants were too late in demanding a jury of 12 men. The demand should have been made be-core any venire had issued. (Strong v. Beardsley, 18 John. 130.) The Justice was also right in refusing to permit a drunken man to serve on the jury. The fact of intoxication was conceded, by neither party objecting to his exclusion. „

The cause of Mockey v. Grey, (2 John. 192,) settles the principle, that a Justice has the power of appointing a guardian ad litem for an infant; and the only question is, whether such guardian must be a real person, or whether the duty to appoint is mere matter of form, and may be satisfied by the use of a fictitious name. We think ihe guardian must he a real person; (2 Sell. Pr. 68. Am. ed.) and that for this reason the judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bruce
48 Iowa 530 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1878)
Ryan v. Harrow
27 Iowa 494 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1869)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cow. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullard-v-spoor-nysupct-1823.