Strong Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
This text of 41 B.T.A. 1273 (Strong Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[1277]*1277OPINION.
The present issue calls for the application to the foregoing facts of the provisions of section 26 (c) (2) of Revenue Act of 19361 entitling a corporation to a “credit” against the “undistributed profits tax” if it complies with certain requirements.
On this record, compliance with these conditions is questionable only in one respect. There was a written' contract executed prior to May 1, 1936, containing a provision expressly dealing with the disposition of earnings and profits for the taxable year. The credit claimed is for an amount equal to the portion of such earnings and profits required to be paid in discharge of a debt, and this amount was paid in the taxable year. The sole remaining condition is that such portion of the earnings and profits be required by the contract to be paid or irrevocably set aside within the taxable year. We are of the opinion that the “application” to the indebtedness of the designated portion of the earnings may, for present purposes, be considered to be called for by the contract “as of” the taxable year, Michigan Silica Co., 41 B. T. A. 511, 515, and therefore to constitute the irrevocable setting aside contemplated by the statute. The credit should have been allowed and respondent’s determination to the contrary is overruled.
Repair and replacement expenses may be deducted as stipulated.
Reviewed by the Board.
Decision will be entered under Rule 50.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 B.T.A. 1273, 1940 BTA LEXIS 1070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-mfg-co-v-commissioner-bta-1940.