Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny

34 A. 919, 175 Pa. 586, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1292

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 25, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 348

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 34 A. 919 (Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny, 34 A. 919, 175 Pa. 586, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1292 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

By agreement filed, trial by jury was waived, and the case was submitted to the learned president of the common pleas. An examination of the record has failed to convince us that there is any substantial error either in his findings of fact or [594]*594conclusions of law; and there appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion. They are all dismissed, and the judgment is affirmed, on the opinion of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

By agreement filed, trial by jury was waived, and the case was submitted to the learned president of the common pleas. An examination of the record has failed to convince us that there is any substantial error either in his findings of fact or [594]*594conclusions of law; and there appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion. They are all dismissed, and the judgment is affirmed, on the opinion of the court below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A. 919, 175 Pa. 586, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-deemer-co-v-dinniny-pa-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack