Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny

34 A. 919, 175 Pa. 586, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1292

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 25, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 348·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

By agreement filed, trial by jury was waived, and the case was submitted to the learned president of the common pleas. An examination of the record has failed to convince us that there is any substantial error either in his findings of fact or [594]*594conclusions of law; and there appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion. They are all dismissed, and the judgment is affirmed, on the opinion of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

By agreement filed, trial by jury was waived, and the case was submitted to the learned president of the common pleas. An examination of the record has failed to convince us that there is any substantial error either in his findings of fact or [594]*594conclusions of law; and there appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion. They are all dismissed, and the judgment is affirmed, on the opinion of the court below.

Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny, 34 A. 919, 175 Pa. 586, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1292 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

34 A. 919 (Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related