Asure v. Hankele
71 Pa. Super. 305, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 97
Opinion
The questions raised on this appeal are adequately disposed of in the opinion filed in the court below sustaining the demurrer.
In addition to the authorities therein cited may be added, Weed v. Hall, 101 Pa. 595; Drumgoole v. Lyle, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 463; Hollander Drug Co. v. American Surety Co., 47 Pa. Superior Ct. 403; Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny, 175 Pa. 586.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Asure v. Hankele, 71 Pa. Super. 305, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 97 (Pa. Ct. App. 1919).
71 Pa. Super. 305 (Asure v. Hankele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny
34 A. 919 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Drumgoole v. Lyle
30 Pa. Super. 463 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Hollander Brothers Drug Co v. American Surety Co.
47 Pa. Super. 403 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)