Asure v. Hankele

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Asure v. Hankele

71 Pa. Super. 305, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 97

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 12, 1919

DocketAppeal, No. 279

StatusPublished

This text of 71 Pa. Super. 305 (Asure v. Hankele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Asure v. Hankele, 71 Pa. Super. 305, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 97 (Pa. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The questions raised on this appeal are adequately disposed of in the opinion filed in the court below sustaining the demurrer.

In addition to the authorities therein cited may be added, Weed v. Hall, 101 Pa. 595; Drumgoole v. Lyle, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 463; Hollander Drug Co. v. American Surety Co., 47 Pa. Superior Ct. 403; Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny, 175 Pa. 586.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The questions raised on this appeal are adequately disposed of in the opinion filed in the court below sustaining the demurrer.

In addition to the authorities therein cited may be added, Weed v. Hall, 101 Pa. 595; Drumgoole v. Lyle, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 463; Hollander Drug Co. v. American Surety Co., 47 Pa. Superior Ct. 403; Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny, 175 Pa. 586.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 Pa. Super. 305, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asure-v-hankele-pasuperct-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack