Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Stringfellow v. Breidegam

Stringfellow v. Breidegam

138 So. 2d 75, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3390
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1962
DocketNo. 61-422
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 138 So. 2d 75 (Stringfellow v. Breidegam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stringfellow v. Breidegam, 138 So. 2d 75, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3390 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff s complaint alleging a conspiracy was dismissed and he appealed. The question presented is whether it stated a cause of action for civil conspiracy. We hold that it did not because the allegations purporting to state a cause of action in conspiracy must be clear, positive and specific. Gair v. Lockhart, Fla.1950, 47 So.2d 826.

The complaint before us sought to imply a conspiracy from the discharge of the plaintiff who was employed for an indefinite term. Such a discharge is not prima facie illegal. Hope v. National Airlines, Fla.App.1957, 99 So.2d 244.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeMoya v. Mosely
525 So. 2d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Churruca v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc.
338 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 2d 75, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stringfellow-v-breidegam-fladistctapp-1962.