Gair v. Lockhart

47 So. 2d 826, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 1091
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 1950
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 47 So. 2d 826 (Gair v. Lockhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gair v. Lockhart, 47 So. 2d 826, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 1091 (Fla. 1950).

Opinion

47 So.2d 826 (1950)

GAIR
v.
LOCKHART et al.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

August 1, 1950.
Rehearing Denied September 25, 1950.

Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, for appellant.

Herbert S. Sawyer, Evans, Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston & Simmons, all of Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has failed to carry his burden of making error clearly apparent. His Bill of Complaint was grounded upon fraud and conspiracy. The allegations of *827 fraud and conspiracy are too general and are not clear, positive and specific as required by many of our prior adjudications. McClinton et al. v. Chapin et al., 54 Fla. 510, 45 So. 35, 14 Ann.Cas. 365; Great American Insurance Company of New York, a corporation, v. Suarez, 92 Fla. 24, 109 So. 299; Baylarian v. Tunnicliffe, 105 Fla. 484, 141 So. 609, 144 So. 844.

Although appellant makes a point of the fact that the Chancellor dismissed his Bill as amended with prejudice, we do not find that he requested leave to make further amendment before the entry of the order of dismissal.

Affirmed.

ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Churruca v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc.
338 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co. v. Icard, Merrill, Cullis & Timm
196 So. 2d 219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Kutner v. Kalish
173 So. 2d 763 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Edwards-Milioti Construction Co. v. Overholser
160 So. 2d 712 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Ocala Loan Company v. Smith
155 So. 2d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Stringfellow v. Breidegam
138 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Oro Verde Groves, Inc. v. Fuchs
136 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Renpak, Inc. v. Oppenheimer
104 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Voliva v. Bennett
201 F.2d 434 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)
Gaulden v. Kirk
47 So. 2d 567 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 So. 2d 826, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gair-v-lockhart-fla-1950.