Stringer v. Stringer
This text of 271 S.E.2d 352 (Stringer v. Stringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary Randall Stringer appeals from the order of the Douglas Superior Court holding him in contempt for refusing to pay the medical expenses of his children under a temporary decree ordering him to maintain the existing health insurance coverage on his wife and children. It was stipulated that the wife had incurred medical bills on behalf of their children for $260.35 and that the health insurance was in effect. There is no evidence in the record whether these particular costs were or were not covered by this insurance.
In Jones v. Jones, 244 Ga. 759 (262 SE2d 71) (1979), we held that the intent of the decree ordering the husband to maintain health insurance to “cover” medical expenses was to make the husband liable for all medical expenses whether or not they were covered by the policy. The trial court here found a similar intent under this temporary decree. We affirm. Compare Roberts v. Roberts, 229 Ga. 689 (194 SE2d 100) (1972).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 S.E.2d 352, 246 Ga. 211, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stringer-v-stringer-ga-1980.