Striewig's Estate

32 A. 83, 169 Pa. 61, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1069
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 30, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 133·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam,

The learned court was clearly right in construing the will in question and holding, among other things, that, instead of dying intestate as to the greater part of her estate, the testatrix, in and by the fourth clause of her will, disposed of all that remained after paying expenses, etc., and the three legacies given by her in the preceding clauses. The questions involved in the specifications of error, so far as they are material, have been sufficiently considered and satisfactorily disposed of in the opinion sent up with the record. On that we affirm the decree and dismiss the appeal, with costs to be paid by the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Striewig's Estate, 32 A. 83, 169 Pa. 61, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1069 (Pa. 1895).

32 A. 83 (Striewig's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood Estate
36 A.2d 835 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Dickson v. Edwards
106 A. 634 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Estate of Moses
3 Pa. Super. 93 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)