Estate of Moses

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Estate of Moses

3 Pa. Super. 93, 1896 Pa. Super. LEXIS 110

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 7, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 108·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Oklady, J.,

The report of the auditor, which was confirmed by the learned court below, covers practically all that may be said with advantage on the subject of controversy.

Gross’s Appeal, 10 Pa. 360, rules the one under consideration and is a binding authority on this court. Nor does it stand alone: Guenther’s Appeal, 4 W. N. C. 41; Ashburner’s Estate, 159 Pa. 545; Bradley’s Estate, 166 Pa. 300; Striewig’s Estate, 169 Pa. 61, when before the court of last resort raised substantially the same question, and the rule of distribution has not been changed.

The decree of the court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oklady, J.,

The report of the auditor, which was confirmed by the learned court below, covers practically all that may be said with advantage on the subject of controversy.

Gross’s Appeal, 10 Pa. 360, rules the one under consideration and is a binding authority on this court. Nor does it stand alone: Guenther’s Appeal, 4 W. N. C. 41; Ashburner’s Estate, 159 Pa. 545; Bradley’s Estate, 166 Pa. 300; Striewig’s Estate, 169 Pa. 61, when before the court of last resort raised substantially the same question, and the rule of distribution has not been changed.

The decree of the court is affirmed.

Estate of Moses, 3 Pa. Super. 93, 1896 Pa. Super. LEXIS 110 (Pa. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

3 Pa. Super. 93 (Estate of Moses) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related