Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia/Strider v. King

Strider v. King

3 D.C. 67
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Strider v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 F. Cas. 234 →
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1826·Published

Opinion

CRanch, C. J.

I think the complainant has no lien on the money in the hands of the trustee, because, 1. The complainant never had the legal estate; he had only aright to call for it upon payment of the balance of the purchase-money; and when he agreed to rescind that contract he lost that right. 2. Because he took a separate security, namely, the bond of Mr. Boone.

The other judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strider v. King, 3 D.C. 67 (circtddc 1826).

3 D.C. 67 (Strider v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.