Strider v. King

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Strider v. King

23 F. Cas. 234, 3 Cranch 67

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided July 1, 1826·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CRANCH, Chief Judge.

I think the complainant has no lien on the money in the hands -of the trustee, because, 1. The complainant uever had the legal estate; he had only a Tight to call for it upon payment of the bal-ranee of the purchase-money; and when he .agreed to rescind that contract he lost that Tight. 2. Because he took a separate security, namely, the bond of Mr. Boone.

The other judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRANCH, Chief Judge.

I think the complainant has no lien on the money in the hands -of the trustee, because, 1. The complainant uever had the legal estate; he had only a Tight to call for it upon payment of the bal-ranee of the purchase-money; and when he .agreed to rescind that contract he lost that Tight. 2. Because he took a separate security, namely, the bond of Mr. Boone.

The other judges concurred.

Strider v. King, 23 F. Cas. 234, 3 Cranch 67 (circtddc 1826).

Pincite

23 F. Cas. 234 (Strider v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related