Strider v. King

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Strider v. King

23 F. Cas. 234, 3 Cranch 67

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 1, 1826

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 F. Cas. 234 (Strider v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strider v. King, 23 F. Cas. 234, 3 Cranch 67 (circtddc 1826).

Pincite

Opinion

CRANCH, Chief Judge.

I think the complainant has no lien on the money in the hands -of the trustee, because, 1. The complainant uever had the legal estate; he had only a Tight to call for it upon payment of the bal-ranee of the purchase-money; and when he .agreed to rescind that contract he lost that Tight. 2. Because he took a separate security, namely, the bond of Mr. Boone.

The other judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRANCH, Chief Judge.

I think the complainant has no lien on the money in the hands -of the trustee, because, 1. The complainant uever had the legal estate; he had only a Tight to call for it upon payment of the bal-ranee of the purchase-money; and when he .agreed to rescind that contract he lost that Tight. 2. Because he took a separate security, namely, the bond of Mr. Boone.

The other judges concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F. Cas. 234, 3 Cranch 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strider-v-king-circtddc-1826.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack