Strickland v. Strickland

680 So. 2d 612, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10383, 1996 WL 571170
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 1996·No. No. 96-469·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jim 0. Strickland raises several issues in this appeal of an order modifying a final judgment of dissolution. Tracy S. Strickland, appellee, concedes that the lower court erred in its calculations when it divided the guidelines child support amount between the parties. Further, remand is also necessary for the lower court to make findings of fact to support its decision to impute income to the appellant for the purpose of establishing the award of child support under the guidelines. See, Nunez v. Nunez, 646 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We find the remaining issues raised by appellant to be without merit.

REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected opinion.

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strickland v. Strickland, 680 So. 2d 612, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10383, 1996 WL 571170 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

680 So. 2d 612 (Strickland v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dyer v. State
680 So. 2d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)