Nunez v. Nunez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nunez v. Nunez

646 So. 2d 290, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11689, 1994 WL 673407

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 5, 1994

DocketNo. 93-2895

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 646 So. 2d 290 (Nunez v. Nunez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nunez v. Nunez, 646 So. 2d 290, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11689, 1994 WL 673407 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jorge Nunez appeals a final dissolution judgment that dissolves his marriage to Margie Nunez, equitably distributes their assets and liabilities, and awards child support. Mr. Nunez contends that in awarding child support, the trial court erred in imputing about $70 per month of income to him without setting forth findings of facts upon which it based the imputation. The final judgment recites the following in support of the child support award:

3. That for child support calculation purposes, the husband’s imputed income is 50% of total net income of $2,580....

Because this finding fails to meet the requirements of subsection 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), we reverse the award of child support and remand this cause for entry of the findings required by statute to support any imputation of income. Wollsch-[291]*291lager v. Veal, 601 So.2d 274 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Neal v. Meek, 591 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Levine v. Best, 595 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

ZEHMER, C.J., and KAHN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI