Strickland v. State
70 S.E. 990, 9 Ga. App. 201, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 466
Opinion
1. The case is controlled for tlie most part by the decision in tlie ease of McAdams v. State, ante, 166 (70 S. E. 893).
2. In the light of the rule that in misdemeanors all who aid or abet are principals, one who, at a place where an illicit distillery is in operation, participates by such acts as helping barrel the liquor, helping keep up the fire, and leveling tlie still worm when it is about to get out of proper adjustment, may be convicted upon an indictment charging him with manufacturing liquor. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Strickland v. State, 70 S.E. 990, 9 Ga. App. 201, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 466 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
70 S.E. 990 (Strickland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. State
167 S.E.2d 677 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Brown v. State
73 S.E.2d 502 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Grant v. State
170 S.E. 394 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Lindsay v. State
122 S.E. 649 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Geter v. State
95 S.E. 877 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Cason v. State
94 S.E. 268 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)