Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Cason v. State

Cason v. State

94 S.E. 268, 21 Ga. App. 122, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 460
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 31, 1917·No. 8960·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Harwell, J.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, which was based upon the general grounds only. Strickland v. State, 9 Ga. App. 201 (70 S. E. 990).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Irwin & Tison, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cason v. State, 94 S.E. 268, 21 Ga. App. 122, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 460 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

94 S.E. 268 (Cason v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
73 S.E.2d 502 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Lindsay v. State
122 S.E. 649 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Geter v. State
95 S.E. 877 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)