Cason v. State

94 S.E. 268, 21 Ga. App. 122, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 460
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 31, 1917
Docket8960
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 268 (Cason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cason v. State, 94 S.E. 268, 21 Ga. App. 122, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 460 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Harwell, J.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, which was based upon the general grounds only. Strickland v. State, 9 Ga. App. 201 (70 S. E. 990).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Irwin & Tison, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
73 S.E.2d 502 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Lindsay v. State
122 S.E. 649 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Geter v. State
95 S.E. 877 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 268, 21 Ga. App. 122, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cason-v-state-gactapp-1917.