Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Strickland v. State

Strickland v. State

592 So. 2d 382, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 641, 1992 WL 13827
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Strickland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 So. 2d 1155 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1992·No. No. 91-1800·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

We affirm the conviction, but the trial court’s application of a legal status multiplier requires us to reverse the sentence and remand for correction. Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strickland v. State, 592 So. 2d 382, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 641, 1992 WL 13827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

592 So. 2d 382 (Strickland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flowers v. State
586 So. 2d 1058 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)