Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Strickland v. State

Strickland v. State

592 So. 2d 382, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 641, 1992 WL 13827
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1800
StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 382 (Strickland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strickland v. State, 592 So. 2d 382, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 641, 1992 WL 13827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

We affirm the conviction, but the trial court’s application of a legal status multiplier requires us to reverse the sentence and remand for correction. Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flowers v. State
586 So. 2d 1058 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 So. 2d 382, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 641, 1992 WL 13827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.