Strickland v. Flournoy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Strickland v. Flournoy

97 S.E.2d 638, 95 Ga. App. 315, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 791

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 14, 1957

Docket36599

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 97 S.E.2d 638 (Strickland v. Flournoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strickland v. Flournoy, 97 S.E.2d 638, 95 Ga. App. 315, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 791 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, J.

1. The measure of damages for the breach of a lease contract by the lessor is the difference between the rental price agreed upon and the actual value of the premises at the time of the breach. “Anticipated profits from a business intended to be carried on by the tenant upon the premises are not recoverable.” Kenny v. Collier, 79 Ga. 743 (2) (8 S. E. 58); Red v. City Council of Augusta, 25 Ga. 386; Miner v. Graham, 60 Ga. App. 189 (3 S. E. 2d 211).

2. Where a petition alleges only special damages which are not recoverable, and does not pray for general or nominal damages, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover in any amount, although he would have been entitled to general or special damages had they been alleged. Barwick v. American Mfg. Co., 30 Ga. App. 761 (2) (119 S. E. 218); Truitt v. Rust & Shelburne Sales Co., 25 Ga. App. 62 (2) (102 S. E. 645); Hadden v. Southern Messenger Service, 135 Ga. 372 (69 S. E. 480); Stewart v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 83 Ga. App. 532 (3) (64 S. E. 2d 327); Beverly v. Observer Publishing Co., 88 Ga. App. 490 (3) (77 S. E. 2d 80). “Where a petition enumerates the items of special damage and this amount aggregates the exact sum sued for, it is assumed that the purpose of the plaintiff was simply to seek a recovery of his special damages, and that he waives the right to recover general and nominal damages. Hadden v. Southern Messenger Service, 135 Ga. 373 (3) (69 S. E. 480); Wright v. Smith, 128 Ga. 432 (57 S. E. 684); Hall v. Browning, 195 Ga. 423, 428 (24 S. E. 2d 392).” Stewart v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 83 Ga. App. 532, 535, supra.

The judge did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur. *316 S. B. Wallace, Wallace, Wallace & Wallace, for plaintiff in error. Martin, Snow & Grant, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, J.

1. The measure of damages for the breach of a lease contract by the lessor is the difference between the rental price agreed upon and the actual value of the premises at the time of the breach. “Anticipated profits from a business intended to be carried on by the tenant upon the premises are not recoverable.” Kenny v. Collier, 79 Ga. 743 (2) (8 S. E. 58); Red v. City Council of Augusta, 25 Ga. 386; Miner v. Graham, 60 Ga. App. 189 (3 S. E. 2d 211).

2. Where a petition alleges only special damages which are not recoverable, and does not pray for general or nominal damages, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover in any amount, although he would have been entitled to general or special damages had they been alleged. Barwick v. American Mfg. Co., 30 Ga. App. 761 (2) (119 S. E. 218); Truitt v. Rust & Shelburne Sales Co., 25 Ga. App. 62 (2) (102 S. E. 645); Hadden v. Southern Messenger Service, 135 Ga. 372 (69 S. E. 480); Stewart v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 83 Ga. App. 532 (3) (64 S. E. 2d 327); Beverly v. Observer Publishing Co., 88 Ga. App. 490 (3) (77 S. E. 2d 80). “Where a petition enumerates the items of special damage and this amount aggregates the exact sum sued for, it is assumed that the purpose of the plaintiff was simply to seek a recovery of his special damages, and that he waives the right to recover general and nominal damages. Hadden v. Southern Messenger Service, 135 Ga. 373 (3) (69 S. E. 480); Wright v. Smith, 128 Ga. 432 (57 S. E. 684); Hall v. Browning, 195 Ga. 423, 428 (24 S. E. 2d 392).” Stewart v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 83 Ga. App. 532, 535, supra.

The judge did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur. *316 S. B. Wallace, Wallace, Wallace & Wallace, for plaintiff in error. Martin, Snow & Grant, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 S.E.2d 638, 95 Ga. App. 315, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-flournoy-gactapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack