Barwick v. American Manufacturing Co.

119 S.E. 218, 30 Ga. App. 761, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 673
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 28, 1923
Docket14059
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 119 S.E. 218 (Barwick v. American Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barwick v. American Manufacturing Co., 119 S.E. 218, 30 Ga. App. 761, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 673 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The writer concurs specially in the judgment of affirmance upon the additional ground that under the terms of the alleged contract the so-called sales agent is under no obligation to perform, and that therefore the alleged contract is lacking in mutuality and therefore void and unenforceable.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dearing Leasing Co. v. Harmon, Inc.
131 S.E.2d 128 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Strickland v. Flournoy
97 S.E.2d 638 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Beverly v. Observer Publishing Company
77 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 S.E. 218, 30 Ga. App. 761, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barwick-v-american-manufacturing-co-gactapp-1923.