Barwick v. American Manufacturing Co.
119 S.E. 218, 30 Ga. App. 761, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 673
Opinion
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The writer concurs specially in the judgment of affirmance upon the additional ground that under the terms of the alleged contract the so-called sales agent is under no obligation to perform, and that therefore the alleged contract is lacking in mutuality and therefore void and unenforceable.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barwick v. American Manufacturing Co., 119 S.E. 218, 30 Ga. App. 761, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 673 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
119 S.E. 218 (Barwick v. American Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dearing Leasing Co. v. Harmon, Inc.
131 S.E.2d 128 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Strickland v. Flournoy
97 S.E.2d 638 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Beverly v. Observer Publishing Company
77 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)