Streeter v. State

521 So. 2d 262, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 594, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 826, 1988 WL 16867
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1671
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 521 So. 2d 262 (Streeter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Streeter v. State, 521 So. 2d 262, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 594, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 826, 1988 WL 16867 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of probation based on violation of conditions one, two and ten of the probation order. Although the reference to violation of condition five was later deleted because of lack of evidence, the deletion was after the notice of appeal herein was filed. We remand for formal striking of the reference to violation of condition five. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perez v. State
521 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 So. 2d 262, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 594, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 826, 1988 WL 16867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/streeter-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.