Stream v. Stream

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Stream v. Stream

614 So. 2d 141, 1993 WL 25555

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 3, 1993·No. No. W92-30·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

STOKER, Judge.

For the reasons given in the companion case of Stream v. Stream, 614 So.2d 138 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), our docket No. 92-147, relator Lynn Anderson Stream’s request for a supervisory writ is granted. Relator’s motion for summary judgment dismissing respondent’s rule to reduce alimony is granted and the rule is dismissed. Costs are assessed to respondent Harold H. Stream, III.

WRIT GRANTED and MADE PEREMPTORY.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STOKER, Judge.

For the reasons given in the companion case of Stream v. Stream, 614 So.2d 138 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), our docket No. 92-147, relator Lynn Anderson Stream’s request for a supervisory writ is granted. Relator’s motion for summary judgment dismissing respondent’s rule to reduce alimony is granted and the rule is dismissed. Costs are assessed to respondent Harold H. Stream, III.

WRIT GRANTED and MADE PEREMPTORY.

Stream v. Stream, 614 So. 2d 141, 1993 WL 25555 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

614 So. 2d 141 (Stream v. Stream) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related