Strauss v. United States Lines Co.

180 Misc. 664, 42 N.Y.S.2d 618
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 25, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 Misc. 664 (Strauss v. United States Lines Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strauss v. United States Lines Co., 180 Misc. 664, 42 N.Y.S.2d 618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s obligation was to refund reichsmarks and entitled plaintiff to a judgment in dollars measured by the rate of exchange prevailing at the place and date of demand of refund. (Hoppe v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, 235 N. Y. 37, 39.) Forty cents per reichsmark represents the official rate of exchange adopted in transactions controlled by the German Government at the time reichsmarks were paid to defendant and is not representative of the value of reichsmarks in foreign exchange.

Judgment reversed, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, the amount to be assessed accordingly in the court below.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes Tool Co. v. United Artists Corp.
279 A.D. 417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 664, 42 N.Y.S.2d 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strauss-v-united-states-lines-co-nyappterm-1943.