Strauss v. United States Lines Co.

180 Misc. 664, 42 N.Y.S.2d 618
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 25, 1943·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s obligation was to refund reichsmarks and entitled plaintiff to a judgment in dollars measured by the rate of exchange prevailing at the place and date of demand of refund. (Hoppe v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, 235 N. Y. 37, 39.) Forty cents per reichsmark represents the official rate of exchange adopted in transactions controlled by the German Government at the time reichsmarks were paid to defendant and is not representative of the value of reichsmarks in foreign exchange.

Judgment reversed, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, the amount to be assessed accordingly in the court below.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strauss v. United States Lines Co., 180 Misc. 664, 42 N.Y.S.2d 618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

180 Misc. 664 (Strauss v. United States Lines Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes Tool Co. v. United Artists Corp.
279 A.D. 417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)