Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank

138 N.E. 497, 235 N.Y. 37, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1147
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 30, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by54 cases

This text of 138 N.E. 497 (Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank, 138 N.E. 497, 235 N.Y. 37, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1147 (N.Y. 1923).

Opinion

*39 Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Held: In an action properly brought in the courts of this state by a citizen or an alien to recover damages, liquidated or unliquidated, for breach of contract or for a tort, where primarily the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum expressed in foreign money, in determining the amount of the judgment expressed in our currency the rate of exchange prevailing at the date of the breach of contract or at the date of the commission of the tort is under ordinary circumstances to be applied. (Gross v. Mendel, 171 App. Div. 237; affd., 225 N. Y. 633.)

His cock, Ch. J.', Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Teca-Print A.G. v. Amacoil Machinery, Inc.
138 Misc. 2d 777 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
Competex, S.A. (In Liquidation) v. Ronald Labow
783 F.2d 333 (Second Circuit, 1986)
Newmont Mines Ltd. v. Adriatic Insurance
609 F. Supp. 295 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Just In-Material Designs, Ltd. v. I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc.
94 A.D.2d 103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
660 F.2d 854 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank
660 F.2d 854 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Meinrath v. Singer Co.
87 F.R.D. 422 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Oppenheimer v. Dresdner Bank A. G.
50 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
J. M. Rodriguez & Co. v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
299 N.E.2d 243 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)
Kamp v. In Sportswear, Inc.
70 Misc. 2d 898 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Simon v. Electrospace Corp.
269 N.E.2d 21 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
Librairie Hachette, S. A. v. Paris Book Center, Inc.
62 Misc. 2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Wagner v. Braunsberg
5 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
In re the Accounting of Bankers Trust Co.
203 Misc. 788 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1952)
Hughes Tool Co. v. United Artists Corp.
279 A.D. 417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
In re the Arbitration between United Shellac Corp. & A. M. Jordan Ltd.
277 A.D.2d 147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
United States v. National City Bank of New York
90 F. Supp. 448 (S.D. New York, 1950)
Taubenfeld v. Taubenfeld
198 Misc. 108 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 N.E. 497, 235 N.Y. 37, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoppe-v-russo-asiatic-bank-ny-1923.