Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank
This text of 138 N.E. 497 (Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
Held: In an action properly brought in the courts of this state by a citizen or an alien to recover damages, liquidated or unliquidated, for breach of contract or for a tort, where primarily the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum expressed in foreign money, in determining the amount of the judgment expressed in our currency the rate of exchange prevailing at the date of the breach of contract or at the date of the commission of the tort is under ordinary circumstances to be applied. (Gross v. Mendel, 171 App. Div. 237; affd., 225 N. Y. 633.)
His cock, Ch. J.', Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 N.E. 497, 235 N.Y. 37, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoppe-v-russo-asiatic-bank-ny-1923.