Straughn v. Thompson

354 So. 2d 948, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15179
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1978·No. No. DD-416·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the Order of the Circuit Court, St. Johns County, holding invalid the tax assessor’s correction, under Florida Statute § 197.056, of a “computer error” in Appellee’s tax bill which omitted a zero from the stated assessed value of the improvements on the property. After Appellee’s payment of the tax for 1974, the error was discovered and additional taxes were back-assessed.

We find that the action of the tax assessor was valid under the holdings of this Court and of the Florida Supreme Court in Mills v. Korash, 249 So.2d 765 (1st DCA 1971), certiorari discharged, 263 So.2d 579 (Fla.1972).

Accordingly, the judgment below is REVERSED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Straughn v. Thompson, 354 So. 2d 948, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15179 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

354 So. 2d 948 (Straughn v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bill Furst, etc. v. Susan K. DeFrances
Supreme Court of Florida, 2021
Smith v. Krosschell
937 So. 2d 658 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Robbins v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH MIAMI, TR
651 So. 2d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1991
1111 19th Street Associates v. District of Columbia
521 A.2d 260 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)