Stoyanov v. Behrle

678 F. App'x 161
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2017·No. No. 16-1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

Yuri J. Stoyanov appeals the district court’s orders entered after the district court dismissed Stoyanov’s claims against Defendants, including claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. '§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2012). Although we previously affirmed the district court’s orders, we subsequently granted panel rehearing and denied rehearing en banc.

We have again reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stoyanov v. Behrle, 126 F.Supp.3d 531 (D. Md. 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoyanov v. Behrle, 678 F. App'x 161 (4th Cir. 2017).

678 F. App'x 161 (Stoyanov v. Behrle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related