Stone v. William Steinen Mfg. Co.

70 A.2d 809, 6 N.J. Super. 178
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJanuary 12, 1950
StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.2d 809 (Stone v. William Steinen Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stone v. William Steinen Mfg. Co., 70 A.2d 809, 6 N.J. Super. 178 (N.J. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

6 N.J. Super. 178 (1950)
70 A.2d 809

MURRAY B. STONE, ALEXANDER H. STONE, E. DAVID STONE, SARAH STONE AND ANNA L. STONE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS AS STONE & STONE CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM STEINEN MFG. CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 3, 1950.
Decided January 12, 1950.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.

Mr. Adrian M. Unger argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, attorneys).

Mr. Charles R. Hardin argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Frederic C. Stoddard, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Richard Hartshorne and reported in 7 N.J. Super. 321.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stone v. William Steinen Mfg. Co.
70 A.2d 803 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Stone v. William Steinen Mfg. Co.
70 A.2d 809 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A.2d 809, 6 N.J. Super. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-william-steinen-mfg-co-njsuperctappdiv-1950.