Stone v. William Steinen Mfg. Co.
This text of 70 A.2d 809 (Stone v. William Steinen Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MURRAY B. STONE, ALEXANDER H. STONE, E. DAVID STONE, SARAH STONE AND ANNA L. STONE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS AS STONE & STONE CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM STEINEN MFG. CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.
Mr. Adrian M. Unger argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, attorneys).
Mr. Charles R. Hardin argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Frederic C. Stoddard, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Richard Hartshorne and reported in 7 N.J. Super. 321.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 A.2d 809, 6 N.J. Super. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-william-steinen-mfg-co-njsuperctappdiv-1950.