Stone v. State
353 S.W.3d 702, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1607, 2011 WL 6042379
Opinion
ORDER
Randy Gene Stone appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment of the motion court under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stone v. State, 353 S.W.3d 702, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1607, 2011 WL 6042379 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
353 S.W.3d 702 (Stone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Marriage of Majeski v. Majeski
353 S.W.3d 702 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)