Stone v. State
353 S.W.3d 702, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1607, 2011 WL 6042379
This text of 353 S.W.3d 702 (Stone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stone v. State, 353 S.W.3d 702, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1607, 2011 WL 6042379 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
Randy Gene Stone appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment of the motion court under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Marriage of Majeski v. Majeski
353 S.W.3d 702 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
353 S.W.3d 702, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1607, 2011 WL 6042379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-state-moctapp-2011.