In Re Marriage of Majeski v. Majeski

353 S.W.3d 702, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1606
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 6, 2011·No. ED 95757·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband, Frank R. Majeski, appeals from a decree of dissolution of marriage. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Marriage of Majeski v. Majeski, 353 S.W.3d 702, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1606 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

353 S.W.3d 702 (In Re Marriage of Majeski v. Majeski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone v. State
353 S.W.3d 702 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)