Stone v. Oklahoma City Ex Rel. Lane
This text of 1944 OK 344 (Stone v. Oklahoma City Ex Rel. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a proceeding commenced by the plaintiffs in error to set aside • a sheriffs sale after confirmation and to vacate a judgment of foreclosure upon which the sale was based. A motion to dismiss was filed for the reason that the appeal is frivolous and taken for delay only. This court called for response, which was filed, and- an examination of the same discloses that there is no contest presented in this court worthy of review. Assuming that this is a proper attack on the judgment, the only substantial ground alleged for vacation of the former judgment was lack of jurisdiction of the person arising by failure to serve process. The testimony of plaintiffs in error, while denying service of process as shown by the sheriff’s return of summons, admitted participation without objection in the original foreclosure trial. In such case we have held that this court will dismiss the appeal. Atkinson v. Shaffer, 187 Okla. 262, 102 P. 2d 943; Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co., 179 Okla. 559, 67 P. 2d 448; Smith v. Aronoff, 179 Okla. 560, 67 P. 2d 447.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1944 OK 344, 154 P.2d 68, 194 Okla. 583, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-oklahoma-city-ex-rel-lane-okla-1944.