Atkinson v. Shaffer

1940 OK 232, 102 P.2d 943, 187 Okla. 262, 1940 Okla. LEXIS 206
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 7, 1940·No. No. 29652.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an action on a promissory note. Judgment was for the plaintiff against the defendants. No defense was presented in the trial court. A motion to dismiss has been filed on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and taken for delay only. A response to said motion fails to point out or suggest any defense. This court has held that where on an examination of the record and the motion to dismiss, together with the response made thereto, it is shown that no issue is presented, the appeal will be dismissed. Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co., 179 Okla. 559, 67 P. 2d 448; Smith v. Aronoff, 179 Okla. 560, 67 P. 2d 447. Such is the situation in the case at bar.

The appeal is dismissed.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, and DANNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson v. Shaffer, 1940 OK 232, 102 P.2d 943, 187 Okla. 262, 1940 Okla. LEXIS 206 (Okla. 1940).

1940 OK 232 (Atkinson v. Shaffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strode v. Abshire
1955 OK 146 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1955)
Edmonds v. White
1950 OK 305 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)
Christner v. Christner
1950 OK 288 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)
Berry v. Crutchmer
1950 OK 111 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)
Stone v. Oklahoma City Ex Rel. Lane
1944 OK 344 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1944)
Flanary v. Briscoe
1941 OK 151 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1941)