Stone v. Mahon
This text of 71 S.E. 300 (Stone v. Mahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is a proceeding, in which a rule was issued requiring the defendant to show, 'by what authority he discharged the duties of the office of recorder, in the city of Greenville.
The facts are fully stated, in the order of his Honor, the presiding Judge, discharging the rule to show cause; and, his conclusion is fully sustained by the authorities which he cites.
The authorities cited by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, are not in conflict with the case of Hardy v. Reamer, 84 S. C. 487, 66 S. E. 678.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 S.E. 300, 88 S.C. 576, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-mahon-sc-1911.