Stone v. Mahon
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is a proceeding, in which a rule was issued requiring the defendant to show, 'by what authority he discharged the duties of the office of recorder, in the city of Greenville.
The facts are fully stated, in the order of his Honor, the presiding Judge, discharging the rule to show cause; and, his conclusion is fully sustained by the authorities which he cites.
The authorities cited by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, are not in conflict with the case of Hardy v. Reamer, 84 S. C. 487, 66 S. E. 678.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
71 S.E. 300 (Stone v. Mahon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.