Hardy v. Reamer

66 S.E. 678, 84 S.C. 487, 1910 S.C. LEXIS 167
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 11, 1910·No. 7418·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The facts of this case, and the material questions of law involved are fully set out in the decree of the Circuit Judge. Counsel for the appellants, the mayor and aldermen of the city of Columbia, have submitted strong arguments in support of their exceptions, but we have reached the conclusion that there is no error. The reasoning of the Circuit Judge is so convincing, and covers the issues so clearly, that we adopt it as the opinion of this Court.

The judgment of this Court is, that the decree of the Circuit Judge be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardy v. Reamer, 66 S.E. 678, 84 S.C. 487, 1910 S.C. LEXIS 167 (S.C. 1910).

66 S.E. 678 (Hardy v. Reamer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WRIGHT v. City of Florence
93 S.E.2d 215 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1956)
Heyward v. Long
183 S.E. 145 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)
Wentz v. Thomas
1932 OK 636 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Commissioners of Sinking Fund v. Byars
180 S.W. 380 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1915)
State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Rhame
75 S.E. 881 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
City of Union v. Board of Commissioners of Public Works
74 S.E. 496 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
Stone v. Mahon
71 S.E. 300 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1911)