Stone v. City of Seneca, South Carolina

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1693

STEPHEN W. STONE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SENECA SOUTH CAROLINA, CITY OF,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:07-cv-03401-HFF)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: May 12, 2010

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary C. McCormac, Clemson, South Carolina, for Appellant. Vance J. Bettis, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stephen W. Stone appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Seneca on all

of Stone’s claims. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Stone v. City of Seneca, South Carolina,

No. 8:07-cv-03401-HFF (D.S.C. May 14, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED