Stone v. City of Seneca South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Stone v. City of Seneca South Carolina

378 F. App'x 356

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 12, 2010·No. No. 09-1693·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen W. Stone appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Seneca on all of Stone’s claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. City of Seneca, South Carolina, No. 8:07-cv-03401-HFF (D.S.C. May 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen W. Stone appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Seneca on all of Stone’s claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. City of Seneca, South Carolina, No. 8:07-cv-03401-HFF (D.S.C. May 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Stone v. City of Seneca South Carolina, 378 F. App'x 356 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

378 F. App'x 356 (Stone v. City of Seneca South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.