Stokes v. State
564 So. 2d 479, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 917, 1990 WL 120503
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 555 So. 2d 254 →
Opinion
ON RETURN TO REMAND
On remand, the trial judge properly sentenced the defendant to 20 years’ imprisonment “not under the Habitual Offender Act. But, ... under the Controlled Substances Act.” This is in accord with Ex parte Chambers, 522 So.2d 313 (Ala.1987), and our opinion on the original submission. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
OPINION EXTENDED;
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stokes v. State, 564 So. 2d 479, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 917, 1990 WL 120503 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).
564 So. 2d 479 (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Chambers
522 So. 2d 313 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1987)