Stokes v. State

552 So. 2d 145, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 721, 1989 WL 141366
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 555 So. 2d 254
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided September 29, 1989·No. 5 Div. 429·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

TAYLOR, Presiding Judge.

In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex parte Stokes, 552 So.2d 144 (Ala.1989), we are compelled to reverse the conviction and sentence based on the charge of unlawful possession of a controlled substance. We therefore remand this case to the circuit court for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stokes v. State, 552 So. 2d 145, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 721, 1989 WL 141366 (Ala. Ct. App. 1989).

552 So. 2d 145 (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stokes v. State
552 So. 2d 144 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)