Stoddart v. Myers

52 Pa. Super. 179, 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 153
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 18, 1912·No. Appeal, No. 231·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that the findings of fact of the learned trial judge were fully warranted by the evidence, and that his conclusions of law legitimately followed. We concur in the views expressed by him in his discussion of [193]*193the law and facts, and do not deem it necessary to add anything further thereto.

The assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoddart v. Myers, 52 Pa. Super. 179, 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 153 (Pa. Ct. App. 1912).

52 Pa. Super. 179 (Stoddart v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frank v. Equitable Credit & Discount Co.
45 Pa. D. & C. 646 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1942)
Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Kowatch
186 A. 258 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Graham v. Mt. Airy Building & Loan Ass'n
156 A. 592 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Graham v. Mt. Airy Building & Loan Ass'n
14 Pa. D. & C. 31 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)
Keystone State Building & Loan Ass'n v. Anderson
70 Pa. Super. 231 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Stoddard v. Thomas
60 Pa. Super. 177 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)